Online Gambling Us Supreme Court
Sports betting in America changed forever with a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that has effectively made possible widespread regulation of the activity.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of New Jersey, which had challenged the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a law enacted in 1992 that confined sports betting to Nevada and a handful of parlay-based state lotteries.
- In the aftermath of the US Supreme Court ruling in favor of sports betting legislation in individual states at the end of May 2018, online gambling is once again the talk of the town. Estimates are we won't see any actual gambling expansions or concrete steps taken to make it a reality before 2020.
- Washington (CNN) The Supreme Court cleared the way on Monday for states to legalize sports betting, striking down a 1992 federal law that had prohibited most states from authorizing sports betting.
- CHERRY HILL, N.J. (AP) — In the year since the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for every state to legalize sports betting, a regional divide has opened as states decide whether to expand their.
- Justice Department’s decision to expand a federal prohibition on internet gambling will cast a pall on the industry as businesses and state lotteries evaluate the implications of the.
The supreme court on Monday struck down a federal law that bars gambling on football, basketball, baseball and other sports in most states, giving states the go-ahead to legalize betting on sports.
Now, the way has been cleared for expanded sports betting regulation on a state-by-state basis. If that sounds familiar to U.S. online poker players, it should — that's the way online poker has been handled the past several years in the wake of Black Friday in 2011.
The Case
New Jersey had lost its initial case but the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case on appeal. Oral arguments commenced in December 2017. Initial observations from industry experts largely leaned the way of New Jersey, with sports leagues and the NCAA arguing in opposition.
After a few months of deliberation during which speculation grew that a repeal was coming, New Jersey prevailed. Six of nine justices sided with New Jersey, two dissented and one offered a partial agreement with the majority and a partial agreement with the dissent.
'The legalization of sports gambling is an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make.'
The Court ruled that PASPA is unconstitutional on the grounds that it violates states' rights.
'It is as if federal officers were installed in state legislative chambers and were armed with the authority to stop legislators from voting on any offending proposals,' wrote Justice Samuel Alito in summarizing the majority opinion. 'A more direct affront to state sovereignty is not easy to imagine.'
'The legalization of sports gambling is an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make,' Alito continued later in the filing. 'Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own.'
The full release from the Supreme Court can be seen here.
Effects on Poker
The repeal of the sports betting ban will come as welcome news to poker players across the country, many of whom have been known to enjoy placing a sports wager or two. However, there could be practical, poker-related ramifications down the road as well.
'Great news to wake up to!' Jason Somerville tweeted. 'We'll see just how much this helps U.S. online poker but the financial incentives for states to pass gaming legislation just got a whole lot more attractive.'
Indeed, many have been eyeing sports betting legalization as a potential avenue for expanded online poker regulation. For instance, late last year when Pennsylvania became the fourth state to regulate online poker, sports betting provisions were included in the landmark bill. That fueled hope that the two could expand hand-in-hand if New Jersey were to prevail.
At least one industry stakeholder plainly predicted such combo expansion in a quote pulled from the Associated Press by Online Poker Report.
'As soon as sports wagering is legalized, online gambling will follow right behind it.'
'If we win sports wagering, online gaming will go to every state that adopts sports betting,' said David Rebuck, director of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement. 'As soon as sports wagering is legalized, online gambling will follow right behind it.'
An April piece from Online Poker Reportreiterated the potential for synergy between sports betting and online poker.
'Any state considering legalizing sports betting, particularly online or mobile sports betting, should also consider legalizing online gambling at the same time,' Steve Ruddock wrote. 'Online gambling and sports betting would fall under the purview of the same regulatory body. Online sports betting and online poker/casino would require largely overlapping regulations, including identity verification and geolocation.'
Online poker in the U.S. already gained a little momentum with the recent announcement of shared liquidity between regulated states coming to fruition. If more states pass gambling expansion and online poker is included, that momentum could continue in a big way.
West Virginia, Connecticut and Mississippi are among the states that have already passed sports betting legislation, with over a dozen others looking like possibilities. Keep an eye out for further developments in those states to see if online poker can take more steps forward.
Tags
Poker and the LawSports bettingGambling legislationJason SomervilleNew JerseyOnline PokerRelated Players
Jason Somerville
The recent Supreme Court decision legalizing sports betting kept analysts busy analyzing, writers frantically writing, and bettors eager to bet.
The opinion was a win for states rights. And while the overturning Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) was specific to sports betting, the challenge was really about whether Congress can legislate how states act.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court opened the door for federal legislation addressing sports wagering. That doesn’t mean the government will legislate sports betting. It merely says they can and if they do it will likely be constitutional.
For now, though the Supreme Court opened the door for legalized sports betting throughout the United States. And while that is great news for sports enthusiasts, it is still not a free and open market.
Here are five things the Supreme Court decision didn’t do.
1. It did NOT legalize nationwide sports betting
While the decision opens the door for legalized sports betting, it does not change the legality of sports wagering. The Supreme Court gave the power to the states.
It’s been one week since the decision and no legal sports bets have been wagered outside of Nevada, where sports betting was allowed under PASPA.
Ahead of the decision, a few states moved forward and passed laws to address sports betting. Since the ruling, more states have taken up the topic.
For instance, New Jersey, the state that challenged PASPA, has an unregulated sports betting law on the books. Officials are introducing legislation to regulate the activity and includes a bad actor clause for any entity that accepts a bet before the legislation is complete. Key officials are pushing for a June 7 vote.
And while New Jersey is moving fast, Delaware might be the first state to accept a legal sports bet outside of Nevada. Delaware confirmed that existing laws put the state in a position to accept sports wagers almost immediately.
The team at Legal Sports Report are keeping track of the national sports betting landscape. To find out what is happening in a specific state, visit the Sports Betting Bill Tracker.
2. It did NOT legalize sports betting across state lines
The Interstate Wire Act of 1961 prohibits bets and the transfer of gaming information between states.
It brings into question how officials will interpret the Wire Act post-PASPA. The Wire Act exempts the transmission of information that supports the placing of wagers in states where sports betting is legal. It does not, however, exempt the bet.
As a side note, poker is different than sports betting. The combination of poker player pools between Nevada, New Jersey, and Delaware falls outside of the scope of the Wire Act.
New York sought clarification in 2011 and the Department of Justice responded:
“Interstate transmissions of wire communications that do not relate to a ‘sporting event or contest’ fall outside the reach of the Wire Act.”
Online Gambling Us Supreme Court Case
The Wire Act was enacted to help support the gambling laws in each state. It seems likely at some point in the future that the Wire Act will be challenged to allow multi-state sports betting between states that legalized the activity. For now, the Wire Act is in play.
3. It did NOT permit for anyone to open a sportsbook
States have the ultimate say of what sports betting activity takes place within its borders. That includes authoring legislation that discusses licensing and regulations. Even New Jersey is rushing to regulate the market to counter the unregulated sports betting law that is in effect.
As the first wave of legislation passes, it is unlikely that any state will create a free market. Likely states will be looking to Nevada and other early adopters as a model to create its legislation.
Any entity that wants to open a sports book must follow the regulations outlined by the state they wish to operate in.
4. It did NOT legalize sports bets to offshore accounts.
The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) prohibits payments from financial institutions to gambling sites. Specifically, it says:
“The Act prohibits gambling businesses from knowingly accepting payments in connection with the participation of another person in a bet or wager that involves the use of the Internet and that is unlawful under any federal or state law.”
The legalization of sports betting is now in the hands of individual states. The bet must originate and stay within a state where sports betting is legal.
The law focuses on the organizations accepting bets originating in the U.S. in violation of existing laws. The law does not mention individuals. An arrest of an American placing a bet with an offshore sportsbook is unlikely.
The risk to Americans is if enforcement of the laws forces the offshore sportsbook to shut down. Any money on with the offending entity is in jeopardy.
Online Gambling Us Supreme Court Forms
5. It does NOT address daily fantasy sports
Us Supreme Court Reverses Online Gambling
Sports betting is a game of chance while daily fantasy sports (DFS) has been deemed a game of skill by the courts. Because of this designation, daily fantasy sports betting is legal.
Some experts believed PASPA applied to DFS, but it was never challenged. Some states prohibit DFS due to existing laws in those states. State legislation addressing sports betting will apply to daily fantasy sports only if specifically addressed.
The bottom line is it all comes down to how each state decides to regulate sports betting. The Supreme Court may have opened the door, but that doesn’t give everyone the freedom to walk in.